Home › Themes › Terrorism & Violence › This claim
Palestinian political factions are terror organisations.
The terrorist label is not an impartial legal category applied consistently. It is a political designation, controlled largely by the same states that arm and fund Israel, and used to delegitimize Palestinian resistance to colonisation. It strips the political context, so a people's organised response to occupation, siege, and dispossession is recast as sheer violence. Under international law, peoples under colonial domination hold a recognised right to resist, affirmed repeatedly by the UN General Assembly. Naming every faction that exercises that right a terror organisation does not describe those movements. It describes the interest of the naming power in denying that legitimate Palestinian resistance can exist.
The label is built to shut down discussion and thinking. Once a movement is called a terror organisation, no further question is permitted: not why it emerged, not what conditions produced it, not what it actually is or means to those who support it. The word instructs the listener to stop analysing and start condemning. A siege holding Gaza since 2007, a military occupation approaching six decades, the theft of land, water, and freedom, all of it vanishes the moment the conversation turns to whether one condemns a named faction.
Criminalising the resistance of the colonised is a standard move in the colonial playbook. Every colonial power has branded those who resisted it as terrorists: the French said it of the Algerian FLN, the British of the Mau Mau, the apartheid regime of the African National Congress, and Nelson Mandela remained on a United States terror watchlist until 2008. The label does not track all mass violence; it tracks resistance. Its function is to convert a struggle against domination into a policing problem, so the coloniser's violence becomes law enforcement and the native's response becomes crime. Designating Palestinian factions as terror organisations runs the same script, recasting anti-colonial struggle as criminality to place the whole question outside politics.
The states that apply this label to Palestinian groups are the same states arming, funding, and shielding the colonial power, which deploys terror acts and tactics. The designations, primarily by Western power, criminalise fundraising for besieged communities, shuts down solidarity organisations, and blocks humanitarian channels. As an example, In 2021, Israel declared six Palestinian human rights groups terror organisations, including Al-Haq and Addameer, a move several European governments rejected after reviewing the evidence. The label was aimed not at armed factions but at the documentation of Israeli crimes.
The charge is never turned on the colonial power that inflicts systematic violence at a vastly greater scale. Israel maintains a military occupation, an apartheid system, and a siege, and has conducted a genocide in Gaza. Violence on this scale is described as security and defence, while any organised Palestinian response is labelled terrorism. This is the double standard at the heart of the term: violence by the coloniser is legitimate by definition, violence by the native is deemed criminal by definition.
Sources
Themes: Terrorism & Violence, Palestinian Society